On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:20:08PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:49:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Feb 2 12:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:20:01PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >> > #if defined (__CYGWIN__) && !defined (__CYGWIN_USE_BIG_TYPES__)
>> >> > #define __pw_uid_t int
>> >> > #endif
>> >> > #ifndef __pw_uid_t
>> >> > #define __pw_uid_t uid_t;
>> >> > #endif
>> >> >
>> >> > struct passwd {
>> >> > char *pw_name;
>> >> > char *pw_passwd;
>> >> > __pw_uid_t pw_uid;
>> >> > __pw_gid_t pw_gid;
>> >> > [etc].
>> >> >
>> >> >Would that be ok, Jeff?
>> >>
>> >> Why not just make __pw_uid_t a typedef?
>> >
>> >Defined where?
>>
>> In pwd.h:
>>
>> #ifndef __CYGWIN__ || !defined(__CYGWIN_USE_BIG_TYPES__)
>> typedef int __pw_uid_t;
>> #else
>> typedef uid_t __pw_uid_t;
>> endif
>
>FWIW, you'd need at least
>
> #undef __pw_uid_t
>
>before the typedefs.
No, you wouldn't. The __ namespace is not supposed to be used by
users.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
