On Feb 2 13:13, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:49:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Feb 2 12:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:20:01PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> > #if defined (__CYGWIN__) && !defined (__CYGWIN_USE_BIG_TYPES__)
> >> > #define __pw_uid_t int
> >> > #endif
> >> > #ifndef __pw_uid_t
> >> > #define __pw_uid_t uid_t;
> >> > #endif
> >> >
> >> > struct passwd {
> >> > char *pw_name;
> >> > char *pw_passwd;
> >> > __pw_uid_t pw_uid;
> >> > __pw_gid_t pw_gid;
> >> > [etc].
> >> >
> >> >Would that be ok, Jeff?
> >>
> >> Why not just make __pw_uid_t a typedef?
> >
> >Defined where?
>
> In pwd.h:
>
> #ifndef __CYGWIN__ || !defined(__CYGWIN_USE_BIG_TYPES__)
> typedef int __pw_uid_t;
> #else
> typedef uid_t __pw_uid_t;
> endif
Fine with me. I don't see a difference, though. What's the advantage
of having another type?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
