--- Robert Pendell wrote:
[top-post rearranged]
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:12:37 +0100 (BST), Lionel B
> Lionel B wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Is it possible in Cygwin (W2k, Pentium 4, gcc 3.3.3) to access a higher
> > resolution (or perhaps I mean "granularity") process CPU timer than the
> libc
> > clock() call? I am finding clock() inadequate for some code benchmarking.
> >
> > [It is not clear to me whether this is indeed a Cygwin issue, or rather a
> > Windows issue and therefore OT here - apologies if so].
> >
> > Having browsed the archives, it seems that it may well be possible to
> access
> > high-resolution *system* timers (perhaps using NT API calls to
> > QueryPerformanceCounter() & family), but I can see no way to achieve
> > per-process timing this way.
> >
> > Any pointers appreciated,
> Search google for "windows high resolution timer" (no quotes) and that
> will probably give some answers.
Been there, done that. Windows high-res timers seem to boil down to
QueryPerformanceCounter(), QueryPerformanceFrequency(), which measure time used
by *all* (including system) processes. This is no good to me.
--
Lionel B
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger -
all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
