> Maybe the operating system is the essence. I've always tried it on NT 4.0 > WS SP6a+hotfixes. Tomorrow I'll check it (the same executable) on 2000/XP.
I've checked it and got the same bad result (crash) on 2000, XP and Win98. I've installed cygwin bundle for compilation of sig_bug.c on XP, compiled sig_bug.c to sig_bug.exe and ran it. Nothing was changed - crash. So could someone who got the _successful_ run of sig_bug.exe with recently (>1.5.7-1) releases or snapshots of cygwin1.dll send it (sig_bug.exe) to my personal e-mail? And please, specify your arguments for gcc, version of gcc, version of cygwin1.dll and version of OS, for example: * gcc -O2 -s -o sig_bug.exe sig_bug.c -lpthread * gcc version 3.3.3-3 * cygwin1.dll from snapshot of 20040920 * Windows NT Workstation 4.0 SP6a+ I'll try received sig_bug.exe with my cygwin1.dll in my environment to distinguish a (possible) cygwin1.dll issue from a compilation (gcc/binutils) issue. Thanks. WBR, Valery -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
