CyberZombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> OT: Any reason why you haven't moved to the Cygwin bash shell? IMO,
> it's much better than 4NT (my prior command-line-of-choice prior to
> Cygwin)...
>
No, I find 4NT to be more flexible than BASH... filename completion is
handier, especially when multiple filenames match what you type; editing
of environment variables (especially PATH) with eset is unmatched by Bash,
and there are some other handy things in 4NT as well, which are lacked by
Bash. I do alot of work with Bash on my job, under Linux, and I often rue
the absence of 4NT there...
... of course, that's when it works...
Dan
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
