On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:20:19PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > Perhaps bufalloc += max(bufalloc, 1000);
Gack! I meant min() :) > Sorry, but no. This will do nothing for the original problem. The idea > was that at some point you need the rate of buffer size increase to > overtake the rate of performance data generation. If performance data is > generated faster than 1000 bytes per query, and adding 1000 bytes isn't > enough, adding *at most* 1000 bytes (as you suggested) is strictly less > effective. I suggested a linear function with a steeper slope (which may > not be enough) or an exponential, which will definitely be enough, but may > introduce huge buffers. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
