On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:58:09PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > UML is not linux. It is a mechanism for running linux in userspace.
Well, the point was that it can be used for testing. I haven't said it was linux, although for me it more or less is, as long as my kernel module or application has the necessary API and run-time environment. But I think you see what I mean, this goes OT. > I thought from this discussion that no one has the technical skills or > time necessary to use the facilities that are already part of cygwin. > Asking whether we would accept patches seems either rhetorical or at > least premature. This is good news :) . Your words in the previous posting sounded so stark and express that I wanted to eliminate the possibilities that: 1) there is something fundamentally bad in that idea; 2) the code would definitely have to be maintained separately. With kind regards, Baurjan. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
