On May 28, 2004, at 1:15 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 12:38:50PM -0400, Michael Hale wrote:
The ideas suggested here are definitely beyond my current ability. I
hope someone else who would like this done, and has the skill will
take
it up.
If it is beyond your abilities then you shouldn't be considering this
option. This is likely never to be an accepted way of using the cygwin
DLL.
What is the correct way for someone to run multiple versions of cygwin
on their machine then? This seems like a very useful feature to me,
since among other uses it would allow a new version to be tested along
side an older but known version of cygwin.
--
Christopher Faylor spammer? -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cygwin Co-Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TimeSys, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
"OS X: because it was easier to make UNIX user-friendly than to fix
Windows"
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
