Hello Lapo, Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 4:18:00 PM, you wrote:
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>Interesting, it is really a little faster when libstdc++ is directly >>compared with the STLport library. So it would make sense to use it when >>performance is an issue. >> >> > I guess it is smaller, too, the stdlibc++ not being shared. > (or it is, now? I forgot to check before clicking "send" ;) ) Unfortunately the shared STLport library doesn't work, at least in this case. -- Best regards, Gerrit -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
