Hello Alex, Monday, November 3, 2003, 7:44:16 PM, you wrote:
> "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Alex wrote: >> >> > An algorithm which computes very long Fibonacci numbers >> > >> > >> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=bnni5p%2412i47o%241%40ID-79865.news.uni-berlin.de >> > was used as a performance testsuite >> > to compare speed of the code produced by various compilers. >> >> > >> |------------------------------------------------------------------------| >> > | Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler, STLport 4.5.3 >> > >> |------------------------------------------------------------------------| >> > | Version 8.35n | - | 0.20 : 0.16 | 0.84 : 0.80 | 3.82 : 3.74 | >> > >> |========================================================================| >> >> >> Do you think to use STLport with the Cygwin/MinGW compiler would >> increase perfomance? > [snip] > New report which contains STLport with the Cygwin has been posted > to news:gmane.os.cygwin under title "C++ Compilers : Comparative > Performance Measurement". > See : > * news://news.gmane.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > * http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/40086. Interesting, it is really a little faster when libstdc++ is directly compared with the STLport library. So it would make sense to use it when performance is an issue. -- Best regards, Gerrit -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
