"Rolf Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> foo(char* const) is no different from foo(char*), from the perspective
> of linking/overloading.
>
> Did you mean foo(char const *)?
>
I meant foo(char* const). not foo(char const *).
Thanks.
=====================================
Alex Vinokur
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
=====================================
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
