"Alex Vinokur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ==========================================
> Windows 2000 Professional
> CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.4(0.94/3/2)
> GNU gcc version 3.2 20020927 (prerelease)
> GNU objdump 2.14.90 20030901
> ==========================================
>
Updated question about objdump.
Low-level and user-level symbol names of foo2(char* const) are foo2(char*)
--------- C++ code ---------
void foo1 (char*) {}
void foo2 (char* const) {}
----------------------------
--------- objdump : Fragments ---------
$ objdump -Cd t.o
t.o: file format pe-i386
Disassembly of section .text:
00000000 <__Z4foo1Pc>: // OK
00000006 <__Z4foo2Pc>: // char*, not char* const
$ objdump -d t.o
t.o: file format pe-i386
Disassembly of section .text:
00000000 <foo1(char*)>: // OK
00000006 <foo2(char*)>: // Not char* const
--------------------------------------
So, is it inaccuracy or convention?
=====================================
Alex Vinokur
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
=====================================
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
