On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:01:14AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Seems to little ole *clueless* me, such such issues could be addressed >in that project. Seems like it'd be a heck of lot more congenial and >productive to engage in creative "what if" scenario's about future >developmemt possibilities than knee jerk character attacks. (Of course >I realize that's more of a cygwin-app discussion - but it would >certainly work well to placate us clueless types in the meantime.)
This is by no means a cygwin-app discussion. Read http://cygwin.com/lists.html . >I've made no demands, asked for no status, and set no deadlines. Just still >*dumbfounded* at the "go tell it on the Microsoft" posturing. Hopefully you are not referring to me. I suggested that interested parties could do a Knowledge Base or google search. I guess you don't qualify. For the record, I called a comment of yours clueless. I did not label you personally. You seem to be having fun doing that to yourself, though, so I'm glad I offered you some enjoyment. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
