On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:52:53PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Ah well, someday the denial will end, or the problem will get fixed >unintentionally when some other change is made and the "cygworld will >go on".
What a clueless comment. It is not "denial" to assert that an OS which allocates memory and doesn't free it is broken. If cygwin triggers a windows problem that does not mean that it is a cygwin problem no matter how hard that is for you to understand. I fix all sorts of problems in cygwin which are really windows problems but, golly gee, if I can't duplicate them, I can't fix them. And, my willingness to debug some things is limited. If it takes running a perl script every five minutes for a day to duplicate the problem, then that is not something that I'm going to do anytime soon. This is not denial. This is a refusal to take a large amount of my time to find a workaround to a windows problem. -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
