* Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) (03-04-01 11:30 +0100)
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
>> Of Thorsten Kampe
>>> Really soon -> a dead computer. (Powercycling is all that works
>> after that)
>>
>> Your computer cannot be more dead than Windows 98 already is. Using an
>> Operating System would you give something like "maximum recursion
>> limit exceeded".
>
> ;-) as I see it any MS generated "OS" has strange limitations/obscurities,
> the above is an obvious one in W98.
> Remember where it all began; "Quick And Dirty Dos" -> very few changes ->
> "MS-DOS 1.0".
NT 4, 5 ("2000"), 5.1 ("XP") and now 5.2 ("Server 2003") have a stable
kernel that doesn't have its roots in DOS.
> IMO the sense of it is still there, even in NT. Can't tell about XP - but I
> would be surprised if the changes were that many.
XP is the first rocksolid Windows OS.
> I've been running _well known_ applications on NT that misbehaved every day.
But they didn't normally crush the whole system.
Thorsten
--
Content-Type: text/explicit; charset=ISO-8859-666 (Parental Advisory)
Content-Transfer-Warning: message contains innuendos not suited for
children under the age of 18
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
