On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:55:18 +0100 Michael Soegtrop wrote: > Dear Cygwin Team, > > I just wanted to confirm that I haven't seen issues with recent test > releases. But the test versions change to fast to say conclusively that > each of the versions are OK. > > The last version for which I did see failures was: > > 3.6.0-0.321.g23f4aac7e760 (2 failures in 10 runs) > > This version was stable for a few days but then started to fail - > possibly some other package changed but it could also be random. If this > is of interest, I can research this or send you pointers to the package > lists in the logs. If it is random, the statistics gathered so far on > later releases are not conclusive. > > I had *no* failures with: > > 3.6.0-0.327.gca22984cc4ad (4 runs) > > 3.6.0-0.336.g2cc4d14f2a02 (2 runs) > > 3.6.0-0.338.ge0bc8172712(2 runs) > > 3.6.0-0.343.gbf94b87f54de(2 runs)
Thanks for testing! > If you have a release candidate, I can run more thorough tests, but it > should be stable then for 2 days. We have no plan for release candidate, but will release 3.5.6 in a few days. -- Takashi Yano <takashi.y...@nifty.ne.jp> -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
