On 2018-01-12 03:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 11 22:52, Denis Excoffier wrote: >> The full list contains 8006 lines, i have the complete Cygwin 32bit >> installation > > The bottom line of this is, and it has been said before and I can't > stress this enough, we can't support this scenario at all, for the > simple fact that we have more DLLs than fit into the 32 bit address > space. It's not much of a problem on 64 bit, but on 32 bit it's just > not feasible anymore. > > Ultimately, You should (must) not install all of Cygwin on 32 bit, only > the set of stuff you need on top of the base category. Or install 64 > bit Cygwin.
If it is not possible for the entire 32-bit distribution to function as a whole, is it time to reconsider how much we provide for 32-bit? And when can we just drop 32-bit entirely? -- Yaakov
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
