On 4/4/2017 9:04 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 04/04/2017 14:43, cyg Simple wrote: >> >> Exactly but the binary install of lapack should require liblapack-devel >> and liblapack0. > > I disagree. It will not happen for my packages >
What's the hardship that causes you to make such a bold statement? You upload the same number of files, the only difference is telling setup that the package has dependencies. -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
