On 03/04/2017 17:07, cyg Simple wrote:
On 4/3/2017 11:00 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 03/04/2017 16:53, cyg Simple wrote:
The file is lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz 32 bytes with no contents. I've tried
two different mirrors. There are also no dependencies applied.
Reverting back to lapack-3.6.1-1.tar.xz proves that it is empty as well
with the same no dependency rules.
source only. all the contents is in:
$ cygcheck -cd |grep lapack
liblapack-devel 3.7.0-1
liblapack-doc 3.7.0-1
liblapack0 3.7.0-1
Then these should be installed dependents of the chosen lapack. Source
only means nothing when you can choose the binary download.
there are today no packages depending from lapack.
I miss the relevance of your last comment; there are
~ 473 empty binary package in the distribution.
Please note that lapack is empty but the debug file for the three
binaries is called lapack-debuginfo anyway as the upstream source file
is called lapack.
Regards
Marco
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
