On 2017-03-02 06:36, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 02/03/2017 13:36, Steven Penny wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 23:31:24, Vince Rice wrote: >>> Then you haven't been paying attention. And I didn't even attempt >>> to make an argument one way or the other, except to say stop >>> arguing. The horse is dead. >> >> Perhaps you could link to a constructive, concrete idea against >> the change that someone has made besides Eric. Even better, you >> could post your own constructive idea; surely you havent emailed >> twice now with nothing constructive to add? > > He was constructive, but you seems biased in understanding the > answer. > > ~ 70% of (weighted*) package managers rejected the proposal > already here: > > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-02/msg00310.html > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-02/msg00295.html > > And I agree with them; we have no bandwith/resources > to handle it.
That makes it over 75% and we can appreciate your efforts and viewpoint. I will just have to continue using my Cygwin setup check and fixup profile script. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
