On 02/03/2017 13:36, Steven Penny wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 23:31:24, Vince Rice wrote:
Then you haven't been paying attention.
And I didn't even attempt to make an argument one way or the other,=20
except to say stop arguing. The horse is dead.=
Perhaps you could link to a constructive, concrete idea against the
change that
someone has made besides Eric. Even better, you could post your own
constructive
idea; surely you havent emailed twice now with nothing constructive to add?
He was constructive, but you seems biased in understanding the answer.
~ 70% of (weighted*) package managers rejected the proposal
already here:
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-02/msg00310.html
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-02/msg00295.html
And I agree with them; we have no bandwith/resources
to handle it.
Regards
Marco
* https://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
