On Dec 21 14:11, Houder wrote: > On 2015-12-21 13:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Dec 20 18:52, Houder wrote: > >>Hi Corinna, > >> > >>According to acl(5), the mask entry (as reported by getacl) is > >>"optional" if > >>the > >>acl contains no 'u:uid:perm' and/or 'g:gid:perm' entries (ace's) ... > >>Ahem. > >>[...] > >>However, setfacl(1) and your setfacl also note, that the default > >>behaviour > >>of > >>setfacl is to recalculate the mask entry ... > >>[...] > >>I decided to experiment ... See below. (the mask entry is not > >>recalculated, > >>it > >>appears). > > > >It is, but only in a limit number of scenarios. I completely forgot > >about recalculating when deleteing ACEs, in fact. I checked this > >against setfacl on Linux again, appied a patch and uploaded a new test > >release 2.4.0-0.15. The mask recalculation behaviour should now be > >as close as possible to Linux, I hope. I also renamed the --substitute > >option to --set, as with Linux setfacl. > > > >Please give it a try. Just, if it's still wrong, I guess a patch has > >to wait until after the holidays. > > Euh ... no problem here. Go, have a holiday!
Thanks :) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
