On 2015-12-21 13:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 20 18:52, Houder wrote:
Hi Corinna,
According to acl(5), the mask entry (as reported by getacl) is
"optional" if
the
acl contains no 'u:uid:perm' and/or 'g:gid:perm' entries (ace's) ...
Ahem.
[...]
However, setfacl(1) and your setfacl also note, that the default
behaviour
of
setfacl is to recalculate the mask entry ...
[...]
I decided to experiment ... See below. (the mask entry is not
recalculated,
it
appears).
It is, but only in a limit number of scenarios. I completely forgot
about recalculating when deleteing ACEs, in fact. I checked this
against setfacl on Linux again, appied a patch and uploaded a new test
release 2.4.0-0.15. The mask recalculation behaviour should now be
as close as possible to Linux, I hope. I also renamed the --substitute
option to --set, as with Linux setfacl.
Please give it a try. Just, if it's still wrong, I guess a patch has
to wait until after the holidays.
Euh ... no problem here. Go, have a holiday!
Regards,
Henri
Thanks a lot for testing this so extensively,
Corinna
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
