On Aug 13 19:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 13 18:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Aug 12 20:59, Achim Gratz wrote: > > > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > >> I think so, but there are likely some corner cases. But I think that > > > >> had been proposed and shot down already, so I was trying to come up > > > >> with > > > >> something less intrusive. > > > > > > > > This is relatively unintrusive. The current user token is always > > > > available. So if owner == current user, for every group in the file's > > > > ACL just check if it's in the current user token and, if so, add the > > > > perms of that group to the owner perms. > > > > > > > > Sounds pretty neat as an intermediate solution to me. > > > > > > I'd play the guinea pig for that snapshot… :-) > > > > This puzzles me a bit. As example you gave something like > > [blah] > Oh, I get it. This is *because* the current Cygwin doesn't check > membership of all groups in the ACL.
I checked in the change we were talking about. Please give the latest snapshot from https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ a try. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpgfdCERBtGy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
