> On Feb 16 14:53, Houder wrote: >> > Hi Corinna, >> > >> > Yes, sorry, setfacl again ... >> [snip] >> >> > RFC :-) > > Dumb bug in Cygwin. I found it and fixed it locally.
Indeed? Did expect a deliberate different school of thoughts ... Apparently, not. [snip] > Actually, I don't think I'm going to apply the fix anyway. As I > mentioned last week, I'm mulling over a complete rewrite of the core > functionality of chmod/acl to read and create ACLs in a unified way > within a single set of functions, rather than having two sets of > functions doing almost, but (as you noticed) not exactly the same thing. Yes, took notice of that. > I have a notion how to create more strict, more correct POSIX ACLs > within the restrictions of Windows ACLs than the current implenentation, > but this needs a lot of hacking and testing so it's not done quickly. Alright. Not in hurry awaiting a solution (at least, I am not). Take your time ... Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
