On Feb 16 14:53, Houder wrote: > > Hi Corinna, > > > > Yes, sorry, setfacl again ... > [snip] > > > RFC :-)
Dumb bug in Cygwin. I found it and fixed it locally. > Btw, my post is NOT a request for a snapshot at the end of the day, in which > things have been fixed ... :-) Heh, thanks :) Actually, I don't think I'm going to apply the fix anyway. As I mentioned last week, I'm mulling over a complete rewrite of the core functionality of chmod/acl to read and create ACLs in a unified way within a single set of functions, rather than having two sets of functions doing almost, but (as you noticed) not exactly the same thing. I have a notion how to create more strict, more correct POSIX ACLs within the restrictions of Windows ACLs than the current implenentation, but this needs a lot of hacking and testing so it's not done quickly. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgp2VJcacPCE5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
