On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:10:42PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Apr 11 09:01, Peter Rosin wrote: >>The newlib license is liberal enough for RedHat to relicense it under >>their own terms? > >That's it, more or less.
I have never seen how you can have it both ways, legally speaking. I was told not to worry about it when I was at Red Hat but no one ever gave me a convincing explanation. Since there are no assignments in newlib land, it just relies on BSD-like licensing. I don't see why Cygwin can't do the same. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
