On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:24:35AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:44:13AM +0100, Denis Dupeyron wrote: >>>Is there any reason for -lm to be an alias of -lcygwin ? I looks >>>rather confusing. >> >>Reason? Nah, it's all just random guesswork. > >Now, now. :-) > >He has a valid question: why is "-lm" an alias to -lcygwin, instead of >simply being stubbed out with an empty archive?
As I stated in other email, -lm is not an alias for -lcygwin. Changing things just to accommodate people who want to use -lm -mno-cygwin is not a viable option. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
