On 2013-06-21 13:10, Warren Young wrote:
On 6/21/2013 12:05, Warren Young wrote:
With cygport, you wouldn't even need to provide sources. We could email
in the new cygport file instead of an RFU.
...and patches.
...and customized .hint files, if needed.
Yeah, I guess sending the .src.tar.bz2 probably is effectively required.
No, it's not. IIUC, the eventual goal should be something that looks
like Ports git:
http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/
together with a buildbot. Package maintainers would then commit their
changes to a package's repo, which would then trigger a post-commit hook
that would cause the package to be built with those changes.
Yaakov
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
