On 6/20/2013 12:44, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
There should NEVER be a reason that you can't use cygport for your packages. If you're having an issue, just provide your (draft) cygport(5) and ask.
Thanks for the offer. I've left myself a note to try this again for the next ctags release.
I have no idea if there ever will be a new Exuberant Ctags. The last release came out 4 years ago, and activity to the ctags-devel list has been under 1 post per month[*] for the past 6 months.
I'd be willing to convert 5.8 to cygport if this plan of Corinna's for an automated build server goes through.
[*] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=ctags-devel -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
