Hallo Soren, Am Dienstag, 12. November 2002 um 08:04 schriebst du:
> [posted today to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (via Gmane) in order to try to get Cygwin's worthies in the loop]. > Subject: Where it runs or what it Does?? (RFC) > Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:56:00 -0500 [...] > One "trouble" is that conceptually the persons involved with perl on > Cygwin don't all want any sort of Cygwin:: namespace and don't really > agree that there's anything unusual about Cygwinperl that differentiates > it from any generic *nix perl. I know better: on Cygwin, there is always > going to be more than one canonical-ly-correct way to refer to a file by > path name (!!): [...] > So my present analysis is that my module belongs in a base namespace of > "Filesys::" and maybe could be named "CygwinPaths"? I think it would keep > the maintainer of Cygwin Perl happy -- or should -- if named like this. > What do YOU think? If you like, why not introduce a namespace CYGWIN:: or Cygwin::, e.g. there are several modules you didn't mention which are supposed to run *for* or *with* a specific application like Apache:: or XMail:: or PLP:: or YAML::, so why not introduce the namespace Cygwin:: (if you look at Cygwin like just another application). I would be perfectly happy with a Cygwin:: namespace! Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
