On Oct 21 13:02, Luke Kendall wrote: > Can I ask a related question: for the few shell scripts and /etc > files provided in base-files: what license are they under? The > package contains lots of licenses, as we've been discussing, but I > couldn't find any indication of which license applies to the actual > non-license files in base-files itself!
Isn't that hard on the verge of nit-picking? These are simple scripts. Their Linux brothers and sisters are under PD so I think it makes much sense to define the Cygwin files as PD, too. David, that's ok with you? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
