On Mar 10 03:59, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:31 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > \Hang on, I take that back. I just realized that this is actually all > > in the GCC header files and that GCC actually uses _GLIBC prefixed > > macros, even on systems not using glibc. Oh well. > > > > Dave? Any chance we can get a new gcc 4.3.4 package with this change > > ASAP? > > >From a previous discussion with Dave, that should be a 4.5.2 built > against 1.7.8. If that's not happening really soon, though, I'll > probably spin a release for Ports instead.
IIUC fenv does not rely on 4.5.x, it's just that 4.5.x needs fenv, isn't it? So, for the time being it should be sufficient to get a gcc4-g++-4.3.3-4 package with just a tweaked c++config.h. I have often replaced a file in a package by just unpacking and repacking the source and binary packages without rebuilding, but I don't know if this c++config.h change would require a rebuild... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
