On Mar 10 10:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 9 17:47, Magnus Reftel wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > it seems that the fenv.h introduction may have caused some problems. > > LLVM fails to build now, and fit seems to me that it could be because > > #define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FENV_H 1 > > is missing in > > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/include/c++/i686-pc-cygwin/bits/c++config.h > > > > For the analysis, please see LLVM bug 9436 at > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9436 > > This isn't a Cygwin bug, but a bug in LLVM. > > How on earth can anybody expect that a define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FENV_H is > set on a system which doesn't even *use* glibc? > > The right thing to do for LLVM would be to add a autoconf test to > check for fenv.h and then use HAVE_FENV_H instead of realying on a > system-dependent define in one of the compiler headers.
Hang on, I take that back. I just realized that this is actually all in the GCC header files and that GCC actually uses _GLIBC prefixed macros, even on systems not using glibc. Oh well. Dave? Any chance we can get a new gcc 4.3.4 package with this change ASAP? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
