On Mar 11 00:22, Schmidt, Oliver wrote: > Hi, > > >>> I'll test the snapshot asap! > > >>The final patch is from cgf. It's probably more performant since it > >>drops the requirement for an additional spinlock. > > >The snapshot contains try #3 on getting the locking right. > > Thank you both for clarifying. I was already aware of that by browsing > through the CVS commits but my statement above was far from clear on > that :-(
No worries. Does the patch help? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
