[ Cc'ing the list back in now, FTR. ] Bernd Bartmann wrote: >> Looks like your post didn't make it through to the list; there's nothing in >> the archive for your message with ID >> <6c18a4f0912280230k601eca9me32c056e09117...@mail.gmail.com>. Probably >> something somewhere down the line thought a .csv attachment was suspicious, >> malicious, spammy-looking or overly-large, so I'm writing off-list to ask for >> a copy. Can't promise it'll show anything, but I'll take a look. > > Thanks Dave for pointing this out. Below you'll find my original > post. Hopefully the attachments will arrive as well.
We have a suspect: > "11:09:08,3362588","bash.exe","3396","CreateFileMapping","C:\Programme\BitDefender\BitDefender > 2010\Active Virus Control\midas32-v2_58\PLUGIN_NT.M32","SUCCESS","SyncType: > SyncTypeOther" That's listed on BLODA. You may be able to work around by following the rebase advice discussed in these threads: "BitDefender again" http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-08/threads.html#00771 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-09/threads.html#00009 "Confusion re: use of rebaseall vs. rebase to relieve BitDefender woes" http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-12/threads.html#00159 (I left a question unanswered in one of those threads about what the effects of relocating the cygwin1 dll to a low base address could be; the brief answer would be "largely theoretical, unless you're the type who does massive number crunching with huge arrays in fortran, or similar".) cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
