On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:30:17PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Sep 28 13:12, Thomas Wolff wrote: >> [meta-response, irrelevant for topic discussion]
That's for sure. >> Corinna wrote: >> > Any reason you redirected your reply to the cygwin list? It doesn't >> > make much sense to disuss this in two lists and it's breaking the >> > threading on the cygwin-developers list for no apparent reason. >> No, sorry, I had been cross-linked to the cygwin-developers archive >> from another mail on this list so I hadn't even noticed. And once you >> are on the web archive, you wouldn't easily touch the mail with your >> normal mailer to automatic construct a proper response, especially >> since I'm not subscribe to cygwin-developers, so I was pasting the >> wrong headers :( >> >> Another note: Since I fail to receive the cygwin mailing list in my mailbox >> for some reason, I follow that on the web archive as well. > >If you are sure you're subscribed with the correct email address, There is no one with "towo" in their name subscribed to the cygwin mailing list. >and if you are sure that it's not something in your ISPs setup, or >your own SPAM filter, then you should send a mail to the mailing list >overseers at sourceware dot org, describing your problem. Maybe they >can help you. Actually, this is a *postmaster* issue. There is no reason to bother overseers. See http://sourceware.org/lits.html#faq . But, since no one with a "towo" in their email address is subscribed or has ever subscribed there doesn't seem to be any mystery here. Also, the web archive is not intended to be a mechanism for responding to email. Using it to monitor the cygwin lists is not very efficient. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
