[meta-response, irrelevant for topic discussion]
Corinna wrote: > Any reason you redirected your reply to the cygwin list? It doesn't > make much sense to disuss this in two lists and it's breaking the > threading on the cygwin-developers list for no apparent reason. No, sorry, I had been cross-linked to the cygwin-developers archive from another mail on this list so I hadn't even noticed. And once you are on the web archive, you wouldn't easily touch the mail with your normal mailer to automatic construct a proper response, especially since I'm not subscribe to cygwin-developers, so I was pasting the wrong headers :( Another note: Since I fail to receive the cygwin mailing list in my mailbox for some reason, I follow that on the web archive as well. I construct responses manually, using the available References headers; however, the web archive does not quote the Message-Id of the respective message itself, so the response will always be positioning one behind in the thread. I'm sorry for this, too, but I think the web archive should be fixed to display also the Message-Id header of each message shown, please. > Please resend your reply to the cygwin-developers list, into the > right thread. I'll post an updated response after I've studied the lots of messages that have been added meanwhile ... :) Kind regards, Thomas -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
