At 08:15 02/05/2002 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: >No problems, but is all the following expected behaviour? Having >uncompressed the new .dll and copied it to /bin: > >1. had to make /proc using mkdir /proc > >2. ls -al / doesn't actually show /proc > >3. ls -al /proc shows (something like) > >dr-xr-xr-x 10 0 medicine 0 Jan 1 1970 1951627 >dr-xr-xr-x 10 0 medicine 0 Jan 1 1970 2022611 >dr-xr-xr-x 7 0 medicine 0 May 2 07:11 registry >-r--r--r-- 1 0 medicine 0 May 2 07:11 uptime >-r--r--r-- 1 0 medicine 0 May 2 07:11 version > >4. Note lack of . and .. > >5. ls -al /proc/1951627 shows a lot of stuff, but > >6. ls -al /proc/2022611 gives >ls: /proc/2022611: No such file or directory
This is probably just because that one is the entry for the 'ls -al /proc' itself, and thus is invalid after end of execution of 'ls -al /proc'. Pierre Muller Institut Charles Sadron 6,rue Boussingault F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
