On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:24:51AM -0600, James Garrison wrote: >This file appears to be missing. > >Before someone jumps on my case and says "Search the archives" >I'd like to point out that > >a) The archives are highly polluted with messages containing > cygcheck output that lists cygreadline5.dll. A search for > just "cygreadline5.dll" returns hundreds of hits most of which > have nothing to do with the problem. > >b) The archive search engine is too stupid to understand > quoted strings meaning adjacency, so that searching for > 'cygrealine5.dll "not found"' is equivalent to searching > for the individual words. Since 'found' appears in cygcheck > output, this does not reduce the number of hits at all. > >Could someone please either answer the question as to why >some packages still require this library even though it does >not appear to be included in the distribution, and then >add the answer to the FAQ?
Hmm. A mailing list search of the stupid search engine with "cygreadline5.dll not found" unearthed this within a few clicks: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-01/msg01619.html If this doesn't answer the question, then I don't know what the question is. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
