http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2002/msg00011.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-01/msg00855.html http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygreadline5.dll http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-01/msg01619.html http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#SEC32
Sigh. --Chuck James Garrison wrote: > This file appears to be missing. > > Before someone jumps on my case and says "Search the archives" > I'd like to point out that > > a) The archives are highly polluted with messages containing > cygcheck output that lists cygreadline5.dll. A search for > just "cygreadline5.dll" returns hundreds of hits most of which > have nothing to do with the problem. > > b) The archive search engine is too stupid to understand > quoted strings meaning adjacency, so that searching for > 'cygrealine5.dll "not found"' is equivalent to searching > for the individual words. Since 'found' appears in cygcheck > output, this does not reduce the number of hits at all. > > Could someone please either answer the question as to why > some packages still require this library even though it does > not appear to be included in the distribution, and then > add the answer to the FAQ? > > TIA > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
