On Thu, Dec 06, 2001, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:36:01AM -0600, Kim, Anthony wrote:
> > But I mean to say, wouldn't it be nice and consistent if
> > ln -s <dir> <link> worked like linkd as opposed to creating a
> > shortcut. I am aware of "mount" under cygwin but the mount is not
> > exported to Windows.
>
> I have checked if it makes sense using reparse points for symlinks
> once when W2K was new. We had to reject using them since they are
> not as flexible as we need it to get POSIX symlinks. Main reason is
> that they have to be absolute windows paths. So they would have to
> be changed each time the mount table is changed in a way which would
> influence them. Many POSIX symlinks are relative links to their
> target. That's completely impossible. And reparse points to files
> aren't supported at all.
A couple of comments: I agree the MS implementation is not
flexible. However, if the reparse points do not cross file
systems, I believe they can be relative. I do this now and
again..
C:\some\dir\here\and\there\> linkd otherdir ..\..\otherdir
The crappy part about the MS implementation is there doesn't seem
to exist an easy way to obtain the link destination. There's no
'ls -l' equivalent.
You're right about reparse points not working with files, but
hardlinks solve that issue. I was thinking in pseudo code:
-s flag given:
if src == directory
create_junction()
else
create_shortcut()
endif
Anthony
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
