On Mon, 24 Mar 2025, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > On Mar 21 16:47, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote: > > From: Jeremy Drake <cyg...@jdrake.com> > > > > This does not include the source files responsible for generating AT&T- > > or Intel-syntax assembly output, and ifdefs out the large table of > > opcode strings since we're only interested in walking machine code, not > > generating disassembly. > > > > Also included is a diff from the original libudis86 sources. > > Can you please make two patches from this? > > Patch 1: Add the original code > Patch 2: Apply the diff
OK. > And you're aware that you're invariably are becoming the maintainer > for this piece of Cygwin, right? I do not like that the fast cwd code exists and digs around for a private variable in ntdll, and I was dragging my feet on integrating the ARM64 support I prototyped because I didn't want to be responsible for perpetuating it. Now I'm becoming the maintainer of my least-favorite corner of Cygwin ;)
