Hi Jeremy,

On Mar 21 16:47, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> From: Jeremy Drake <cyg...@jdrake.com>
> 
> This does not include the source files responsible for generating AT&T-
> or Intel-syntax assembly output, and ifdefs out the large table of
> opcode strings since we're only interested in walking machine code, not
> generating disassembly.
> 
> Also included is a diff from the original libudis86 sources.

Can you please make two patches from this?

Patch 1: Add the original code
Patch 2: Apply the diff

And you're aware that you're invariably are becoming the maintainer
for this piece of Cygwin, right?


Thanks,
Corinna

Reply via email to