Hi Jeremy, On Mar 21 16:47, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote: > From: Jeremy Drake <cyg...@jdrake.com> > > This does not include the source files responsible for generating AT&T- > or Intel-syntax assembly output, and ifdefs out the large table of > opcode strings since we're only interested in walking machine code, not > generating disassembly. > > Also included is a diff from the original libudis86 sources.
Can you please make two patches from this? Patch 1: Add the original code Patch 2: Apply the diff And you're aware that you're invariably are becoming the maintainer for this piece of Cygwin, right? Thanks, Corinna