On Sat, 1 Mar 2025, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Note: In the long run, we may very well want to follow the insightful > suggestion by a helpful Windows kernel engineer who pointed out that it > may be less fragile to implement kind of a disassembler that has a > better chance to adapt to the ever-changing code much > like it was prototyped out for ARM64 at > https://gist.github.com/jeremyd2019/aa167df0a0ae422fa6ebaea5b60c80c9
Luckily, ARM64 is in "ARM mode", where instructions are 32-bits long, so you don't have to code how to decode every instruction to successfully skip them.
