On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:53:58PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
>On 4/30/2013 14:27, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 02:09:52PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
>>> Embedding <html> within <html> is eeevil.
>>
>> faq.html is a pretty simple file and it seems to work. Are there any
>> non-religious advantages to doing this?
>
>Conceivably browsers could stop tolerating it.
Yeah, that's what I thought you'd say. I don't think it's worth the
effort and expense of duplicating Cygwin's CSS elsewhere but maybe
there's a clever way to avoid the html nesting which wouldn't require
that.
>>> - Any comments about the other items in my FUTURE WORK section?
>>> Unconditional green light, or do you want to approve them one by one?
>>
>> You have the right to change anything in the doc directory. Anything
>> outside of that will require approval.
>
>The final removal of doctool requires replacing the DOCTOOL/SGML
>comments in winsup/cygwin/{path,pinfo}.cc with Doxygen comments, and
>folding most of the contents of winsup/cygwin/*.sgml into Doxygen
>comments within the relevant source files.
I'd rather just move this out of the code entirely. The user visible
interfaces aren't going to change and we haven't made a habit of
adding new DOCTOOL tags. I don't know who first thought that adding
these was a good idea (it may predate my time on the project even
though CVS insists that I added it with version 1.1) but, if Corinna
agrees when she gets back, I'd like to just get rid of these.
cgf
