On Apr 1 11:34, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:05:56PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Chris, do you think there's anything speaking against rearranging this > >so that the FH_FS and FH_NETDRIVE definitions are separate from the > >stuff under /proc? Or, hang on, we should change all PROC values, > >along these lines: > > > > FH_FS = FHDEV (0, 247), /* filesystem based device */ > > FH_NETDRIVE= FHDEV (0, 246), > > FH_DEV = FHDEV (0, 245), > > > > FH_PROC = FHDEV (0, 244), > > FH_REGISTRY= FHDEV (0, 243), > > FH_PROCESS = FHDEV (0, 242), > > FH_PROCNET = FHDEV (0, 241), > > FH_PROCESSFD = FHDEV (0, 240), > > FH_PROCSYS = FHDEV (0, 239), > > FH_PROCSYSVIPC = FHDEV (0, 238), > > > > FH_PROC_MIN_MINOR = FHDEV (0, 200), /* Arbitrary value */ > > > >Then we can simplify the isproc_dev definition like this: > > > >#define isproc_dev(devn) \ > > (devn >= FH_PROC_MIN_MINOR && devn <= FH_PROC) > > > >Does that sound ok? > > Yes. I was, for a while, trying to keep the device numbers the same as > Linux but I don't think that even applies in this case.
Cool, thanks. Yaakov, would you mind to apply youir patch with this change? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
