On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:20:44PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:40:58PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> >Close enough. >> >So, are we jump-starting the car, or replacing the battery? ;-) >> >> I'm just hoping for someone to come up with a creative name for >> the car. > >"cygferrari"? ;-) > >Seriously, though... "cygprogopts"? "cygoverride"? Come to think of it, >"cygoptions" works pretty well, especially if we plan to add other >functionality, such as setting heap_chunk_in_mb & co. Are there other >(undocumented) options that need this kind of control? Do we want them >all controlled from one script, or from a set of scripts? Would it make >sense for the script to act based on a name through which it was invoked, >as well as command line parameters (and provide symlinks with these >names)?
I didn't think of heap_chunk_in_mb but that makes sense, too. AFAIK, there aren't any other options. >Also, should this script be in /usr/sbin instead? Logically maybe, but from the standpoint of the cygwin community trying to use it, I don't know. cgf
