On Tuesday, 10 April 2007 at 9:00:42 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Monday, 9 April 2007 at 12:16:47 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: >>> The latter part is incorrect and should be reverted. Furthermore, >>> usage() should be static. >> Can you give details? > > usage() should be the way it was before your commit, except that it > should be static.
You mean declared as a static function? In a program of a single file? As I said before, >> Can you give details? Specifically, this doesn't match my recollection of "good practice". Where is this behaviour mandated? Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
pgpwhKPBFnFM0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
