Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:36:28 +0200
Guido van Rooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:20:02AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:37:12 +0000 (UTC)
Guido van Rooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
guido 2006-08-24 07:37:12 UTC
[..]
Log:
MFC: ipfilter 4.1.13
This begs for a question: if ipfilter can not be updated without
breaking the tree anymore, does it belong there in the first place?
We could of course also get rid of the tree ;)
-Guido
Tree without ipfilter or ipfilter without tree - this is a
technicality.
Seriously though, I wonder how ipfilter is being tested before being
checked in? Past two commits by you suggested that no testing was done
at all.
Missing an added file when doing a check-in is a forgivable mistake,
especially since Guido isn't the author and likely doesn't have as deep
of an understanding of the changes as the author does. And, I do highly
appreciate that Guido is responding quickly to the problems. The
process with ipfilter still isn't perfect, but it's definitely an
improvement over the past.
Scott
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
